Hi there! Choosing between a refractor and reflector telescope can be really confusing. Both have unique advantages, so how do you pick the right one?
As a fellow astronomy enthusiast, I‘ve spent many nights peering through both kinds of telescopes. Let me walk you through everything you need to know to choose the best telescope for you!
Refractor vs Reflector Telescopes: A Quick Comparison
Before we dive in, here‘s a quick overview of how they differ:
|Refractor Telescope||Reflector Telescope|
|Optics||Lenses bend and focus light||Mirrors bend and focus light|
|Best For||Viewing planets & moon||Deep sky objects|
|Maintenance||Minimal – enclosed||More – exposed|
Make sense so far? Let‘s look at some history first before diving into the details.
A Brief History of Refracting and Reflecting Telescopes
While Galileo didn‘t invent the telescope, he drastically improved the refracting telescope design in the early 1600s. But where did it all begin?
The Invention of the Refracting Telescope
In 1608, a Dutch lensmaker named Hans Lippershey assembled the first documented refracting telescope. It used a convex objective lens and a concave eyepiece lens inside a tube.
Lippershey‘s telescope could magnify objects 3x. But Galileo improved on this design, grinding his own lenses to achieve 30x magnification!
By 1610, Galileo was observing the moons of Jupiter and phases of Venus. His telescopes allowed unprecedented views of the cosmos. Refracting telescopes lit the fuse for the scientific revolution.
Newton Invents the Reflector
In the 1660s, scientist Sir Isaac Newton pioneered the design for the first practical reflecting telescope. This used a primary concave mirror to collect and focus light.
Newton‘s reflecting telescope solved a problem plaguing refractors – chromatic aberration caused by lens dispersion. This produced rainbow-colored fringes around objects.
By avoiding lenses entirely, Newton‘s reflector design produced clearer images free of color distortion.
Nearly all large research telescopes today are reflectors. Both types continued improving through the 1700s and 1800s as optics and mounts were perfected.
Now let‘s look at how each of these revolutionary designs actually works!
How Refracting Telescopes Work
Refractors use a glass lens at the front to collect, bend, and focus light into your eye. Light enters through the objective lens, which magnifies objects far away. This light comes to a focus point near the eyepiece lens.
The eyepiece lens acts like a magnifying glass, enlarging this focused image so it‘s bigger for your eye. The tube length between the lenses determines magnification power.
The key advantage of refractor telescopes is great image clarity and sharpness. But lens size is limited by weight and cost. Giant lenses can suffer from sagging. Chromatic aberration, causing color fringing, also needs correction.
Still, well-made refractors excel at Moon and planetary observation. And smaller, portable refractors are easy to transport for amazing views!
Real World Examples
One amazing example is the Great Refractor telescope at the University of Pittsburgh. This historic telescope has a 23-cm diameter lens that‘s over 5 meters long! Built in 1861, it‘s still used for public viewing nights.
Smaller 80-120mm refractors are excellent portable scopes. These provide bright, detailed images perfect for lunar and planetary viewing from your backyard. Refractors really shine for this kind of observation.
How Reflecting Telescopes Work
Instead of lenses, reflectors use curved mirrors to collect, focus, and reflect light to your eye. Light enters the tube and bounces off the large primary mirror at the bottom. This parabolic mirror shape reflects light to a focus point.
A small secondary mirror near the top of the tube intercepts this focused light and reflects it out the side of the telescope, where the eyepiece is located.
Reflectors avoid chromatic aberration found in refractors. Mirrors also collect more light, ideal for observing faint, deep sky objects like galaxies and nebulae.
The main downside is that reflector telescopes require periodic alignment (collimation). They also need occasional mirror cleaning due to the open tube design.
But overall, reflectors give you excellent light-gathering power at reasonable cost. The simplicity of mirrors also allows giant research telescopes.
Real World Examples
The Hubble Space Telescope is a reflecting telescope with a 2.4 meter diameter primary mirror. Hubble has captured breathtaking glimpses of distant galaxies, nebulae, and star clusters from Earth orbit.
For amateur astronomers, a well-made 6 to 12 inch dobsonian reflector is perfect for jaw-dropping views of nebulae, star clusters, and galaxies from a dark sky location. Their simple but sturdy design and powerful light collection are perfect for deep sky viewing.
Comparing Refractor vs. Reflector Telescopes
Now that you understand how each type works, let‘s directly compare them across a few key performance factors:
Image Sharpness: Refractors excel here. Lenses give crisp views with high contrast, especially at lower magnifications. Good reflectors can match or come close to refractors in sharpness.
Chromatic Aberration: Only an issue in refractors. Lens dispersion causes color fringing around high-contrast objects. Reflectors avoid this completely.
Field of View: Refractors have inherently wider fields of view, especially low focal ratio models. This allows seeing more sky in the eyepiece.
Mechanical Design Factors
Portability: Short refractors are highly portable. But compact reflector designs, like dobsonians, can also be quite portable.
Mounting: Refractors are better-suited for equatorial mounts to track objects. Reflectors usually use simpler altazimuth mounts.
Collimation:Reflector collimation can be a nuisance but isn‘t too difficult. Good refractors rarely need collimation.
Maintenance: Reflectors need occasional mirror cleaning and realignment. Refractors are sealed, requiring little maintenance.
Light Gathering Ability: For a given price, reflectors generally have greater light grasp with larger apertures. This reveals fainter details.
Controlling Costs: Reflector costs scale up slower with increasing aperture size. Refractors get disproportionally expensive.
Deep Sky Capability: With their light capture advantage, reflectors provide the best views of faint galaxies and nebulae.
Planetary/Lunar Observing: Refractors edge out reflectors in crisp details on solar system targets like the Moon and planets.
Some Approximate Cost Examples
To give you a better idea of the price differences, here are some typical new costs for decent quality beginner models:
80mm Refractor: $300 to $500
6 inch Reflector: $300 to $400
120mm Refractor: $600 to $1,000
10 inch Reflector: $500 to $700
150mm Refractor: $1,500 to $3,000
12 inch Reflector: $800 to $1,200
As you scale up in size, refractors get exponentially more expensive! Food for thought.
Making the Choice: Your Needs and Budget
Now for the big question – which type is right for you? Here are a few crystal clear recommendations:
- On a tight budget? A reflector gives the most aperture per dollar. Great for getting started!
- Want stunning views of planets and the moon? A nice refractor in the 80-120mm range is the way to go.
- Got dark skies and want majestic deep sky views? A sturdy reflector with 8+ inches of light grasp cannot be beat.
- Need a scope to live on an equatorial mount for astrophotography? Refractors are the best choice here.
I hope these insights help steer you towards the perfect telescope for your needs! Don‘t hesitate to reach out if you have any other questions.
And most importantly, get out under those starry skies and enjoy the journey! There‘s a universe of wonders awaiting you. Clear skies!