Internet access has become an essential utility for most households and businesses. With more activities like work, education, shopping and entertainment happening online, having a fast and reliable internet connection is more important than ever.
Two providers aiming to deliver broadband internet are Starlink and Frontier Communications. Both offer distinct technologies and value propositions. So how exactly do Starlink and Frontier compare, and which is the better option for your internet needs?
Brief Background on Starlink and Frontier
First, let’s cover some basics on both companies.
Starlink was founded in 2015 as a subsidiary of SpaceX. It utilizes a network of low-earth orbit (LEO) satellites to provide broadband internet globally, including rural and remote areas. The beta service launched in 2020 and Starlink continues expanding its coverage.
Frontier Communications traces its history back to 1935 as a rural telephone provider. Today, Frontier offers internet, TV, phone and data services to residential and business customers in 25 U.S. states using fiber optic and DSL networks. Frontier filed for bankruptcy in 2020 but restructured and emerged positioned to upgrade its infrastructure.
The Technology: Satellite vs Landlines
The most fundamental difference between Starlink and Frontier is how they deliver internet connectivity:
-
Starlink transmits data between its low-earth orbit satellites and user terminals equipped with satellite dishes. This makes Starlink capable of providing coverage almost anywhere with a clear view of the sky.
-
Frontier utilizes a combination of fiber optic cables and DSL over existing landline infrastructure. Fiber offers ultra-fast speeds while DSL depends on your proximity to equipment.
So Starlink’s satellite network enables widespread service, but weather can degrade the signal. Frontier’s speeds vary drastically depending on fiber or DSL infrastructure availability in your area.
How Each Technology Works
To understand the advantages and limitations of each approach, let’s explore some more technical details on how satellite internet and landline networks function:
Satellite Internet
Starlink’s network consists of over 3,000 low-earth orbit (LEO) satellites that beam internet signals to user terminals equipped with satellite dishes. Networks with satellites closer to Earth avoid the high latency or lag time of previous satellite internet services relying on high-earth orbit satellites much farther away.
But unlike physical fiber optic or DSL lines, satellite signals must transmit wirelessly between satellites in space and user equipment on the ground. This makes them more susceptible to:
-
Weather interference – Heavy rain, snow, or storms can temporarily degrade or interrupt satellite signals more severely than landlines.
-
Capacity constraints – The number of satellites and ground stations limits how much bandwidth a satellite internet provider can distribute across users. Supported users per satellite is improving but still trails physical networks.
-
Line-of-sight requirements – Satellite antennas need a mostly unobstructed view of the sky to connect. Signals can pass through light clouds but are blocked by buildings, dense foliage or hills and mountains.
So while satellites can extend beyond remote terrestrial infrastructure, the wireless delivery has downsides like weather and capacity effects terrestrial lines avoid.
Landline Networks
In contrast to wireless satellite networks traversing space, Frontier relies on physical network infrastructure like:
-
Fiber optic cable – Optical fiber carries data signals in pulses of light through glass cabling. Fiber can transmit data over 100x faster than traditional copper lines with lower signal loss over distance. This enables reliable gigabit internet speeds.
-
DSL – Short for “digital subscriber line”, DSL transmits data as electrical signals over existing copper telephone lines already connected to homes and businesses. But speeds degrade rapidly over long distances from network switching equipment.
Landline networks therefore avoid weather concerns and can supply consistent speeds. But laying or upgrading cable and equipment requires massive upfront investment before serving customers. Satellites operate from space so provide faster time-to-coverage for new regions, but have capacity challenges as user counts spike.
Speed and Latency Comparison
When it comes to internet performance, speed and latency are key metrics. Here is how Starlink and Frontier compare:
-
Download Speeds
- Starlink offers 50 Mbps to 200 Mbps
- Frontier fiber advertises speeds up to 2 Gbps
- Frontier DSL can be quite slow with speeds below 10 Mbps
-
Latency
- Frontier fiber provides lowest latency
- Starlink satellite latency is higher but improving as new satellites launch
- Frontier DSL latency depends greatly on location
So Frontier fiber delivers blazing fast speeds with low latency. But availability is still limited as Frontier continues transitioning from DSL to fiber networks.
Starlink offers decent broadband speeds considering the satellite technology, but latency is higher than fiber. Still, new satellites with inter-satellite laser links are lowering Starlink latency towards 50ms – on par with cable internet.
Other key reliability metrics paint a similar picture:
- Jitter – Variation in latency. Frontier fiber has very low jitter while Starlink jitter can spike temporarily during heavy weather.
- Packet Loss – Data packets dropped rather than delivered. Below 1% is excellent. Fiber rarely sees over 1% packet loss while satellite may have brief larger packet loss during weather events.
So Frontier’s physical fiber infrastructure provides better connectivity consistency. But Starlink performs far better than early satellite internet providers, continuing to narrow the gap to landline networks as technology improves.
Availability and Reliability
There is an inherent tradeoff between availability and reliability:
-
Starlink Availability
- Currently 700,000+ subscribers in over 40 countries
- Targeting near global connectivity as more satellites launch
- Goal to exit beta with full service in all key markets by end of 2023
-
Frontier Availability
- Offer services in 25 U.S. states
- Focused on West, Midwest, and Southern regions
- Fiber network extends to ~50% of homes eligible for Frontier services
-
Starlink Reliability
- Satellite network uptime over 99.9% outside severe weather events
- Heavy precipitation may interrupt service with total outage time varying:
- ~5 minutes per day at high latitude locations like Washington state
- ~1 hour cumulative per month for southern locations like Arizona
- Satellite technology and software improvements aim to limit weather impact
-
Frontier Reliability
- Fiber network uptime consistent at 99.9% outside damage or cut lines
- DSL uptime still highly reliable but more susceptible to electrical interference
- Higher fiber availability improves overall network redundancy
So while satellite delivers the reach, fiber backs it up on reliability and sustained performance. But Starlink is competing well on key metrics as it scales up service despite the challenges of space-based connectivity.
Cost Comparison
When considering home internet service, the costs are always an important factor:
-
Starlink
- $599 upfront hardware cost
- $110 monthly for residential service
- Business and RV plans $599 and $135/month
-
Frontier
- No equipment fees
- Fiber plans from $50/month for 500 Mbps
- Slower DSL plans from $30/month
If Frontier’s fiber services are accessible, the pricing is very competitive with typical broadband plans.
Starlink’s infrastructure and space network make the pricing reasonable given the technology involved. Importantly, monthly costs are driving towards parity with landline providers.
Customer Experience
Reviews of customer service for both providers are mixed, although Starlink’s limitations as an earlier stage provider are noticeable:
-
Starlink
- 69% Customer Satisfaction Score on Value for Money
- 72% would recommend to a friend (Net Promoter Score)
- Self-setup poses some difficulties for less tech-savvy
- Difficult to reach Support with 3+ day wait times
-
Frontier
- 61% Consumer Rating on overall customer experience
- Below average ratings for value, speed, and reliability
- Professional installation for fiber customers
- Long customer service hold times still a common complaint
Early adopters drawn to Starlink satellite capabilities give it strong marks considering the unique infrastructure challenges. Still, with limited support staff compared to user growth, customer experience suffers from growing pains.
Meanwhile, years of underinvestment have damaged Frontier’s reputation despite fiber network potential. But their experience in setup and operations provide advantages as both ISPs take different paths towards enhancing the customer experience.
Financial Comparison
Both companies have taken distinct financial paths to deliver and improve broadband infrastructure:
-
Starlink
- Raised $1.6 billion in new funding mid-2022
- Would cost $5-10 billion to complete satellite network
- SpaceX investing $5-$10 million per launch at rate of 1 launch every 7-10 days
-
Frontier
- Utilized $10+ billion in bankruptcy and restructuring financing
- Has not reported an annual profit since 2010
- Lost 90% of its market value from 2008 to 2019
- Has reduced debt load to focus on fiber improvements
SpaceX’s ability to self-fund Starlink’s satellite infrastructure offers flexibility unavailable to Frontier’s more traditional telecom model.
But while Frontier’s financial hardships stemmed from saddling debt and mismanagement, it enters its post-bankruptcy rebuild on stable footing under new leadership.
Market Outlook and Predictions
As both companies work to enhance infrastructure and capabilities, what might the future hold in the internet provider landscape?
Starlink Outlook
- Targeting 100 million+ global subscribers in the long term
- SpaceX launching satellites faster than any competitor
- Technology enhancements steadily improving broadband service
- Main obstruction still antenna production scaling
- Partnerships emerging (airlines, Microsoft Azure integration)
Frontier Outlook
- Fiber buildout key growth priority
- DSL footprint offers low-cost 5G, fiber transition pathway
- Cost focus and operational streamlining
- Expanded enterprise services market share
Competitive Forces
- Other satellite providers emerging but well behind Starlink’s progress
- 5G fixed wireless may compete primarily with DSL/copper services
- Rural subsidies a factor but require extensive terrestrial buildout
- Lack of redundancy from single fiber provider still issue for some customers
In summary, Starlink’s satellite capacity remains its biggest strategic advantage and challenge. Maintaining the incredible launch pace is vital to staying ahead of competitors.
Frontier is prioritizing fiber expansion for future-proofing as DSL fades, leaning on its existing infrastructure for 5G transitions. While lagging Starlink’s exponential growth, a stable Frontier expanding fiber availability forces wireless providers to keep enhancing speed and latency.
So while the satellite vs landline tech battle rages on, internet providers utilizing both allows each side to shore up individual weaknesses with unique strengths.
Final Verdict
In conclusion, Starlink satellite internet offers the most potential from a future-looking standpoint, while Frontier fiber provides the fastest internet today (where available).
For most rural users, Starlink is the obvious option. Suburban and urban customers will likely want to seek out Frontier’s fiber optic services for pricing and speed advantages over Starlink.
But as Starlink expands and evolves its satellite network, it may eventually outpace even fiber optic on availability while continuing to improve speeds and latency. Both internet providers have advantages now and development planned, so the competition for the future is worth monitoring.