Skip to content

Just How Accurate Is Fitbit‘s Heart Rate Tracking? An Expert‘s Perspective

As a tech expert with a keen interest in health and fitness wearables, I‘m often asked about the accuracy of Fitbit‘s heart rate tracking feature. Heart rate is one of the most essential metrics our bodies produce, a vital sign that provides a window into cardiovascular health, fitness levels, and even stress and recovery. So it‘s perfectly understandable that Fitbit users want to know if they can trust the data they see on their trackers. In this in-depth post, I‘ll unpack the technology behind Fitbit‘s heart rate sensors, analyze the current research on their accuracy, and provide some practical tips for getting the most reliable readings.

How Optical Heart Rate Sensors Work

While early fitness trackers relied on less convenient chest straps to measure heart rate, Fitbit was one of the pioneers in bringing optical heart rate (OHR) tracking to the wrist. Rather than detecting the electrical impulses generated by the heart, optical sensors use a method called photoplethysmography (PPG).

Here‘s how it works: the tracker beams green LED light into the skin, which is partially absorbed by the blood flowing through your veins. As your heart beats and blood volume increases, more green light is absorbed. Between beats, more of the light is reflected back to the sensor. By flashing the lights hundreds of times per second and using algorithms to analyze the changing light absorption patterns, the tracker can determine your heart rate.

Some trackers, particularly those geared towards sleep tracking, use infrared light instead of green. Infrared penetrates deeper into the skin, allowing the sensor to capture data even when you‘re not moving. Fitbit‘s PurePulse technology employs a combination of green and infrared lights to track heart rate 24/7.

Accuracy Analysis: The Scientific Evidence

So how well does this optical sensing method work in practice? Fitbit claims that their trackers are "within 3 beats per minute for about 95% of users," but some independent studies have found higher error rates, particularly during exercise.

A 2017 study published in JAMA Cardiology put the Fitbit Surge and Charge HR to the test against an ECG in 50 healthy adults. Participants walked, jogged, and cycled for 18 minutes while wearing the trackers. The results showed that the Fitbits were "acceptably accurate" at rest and during prolonged exercise, but had "variable accuracy" during activity. Compared to the ECG, the trackers had a median error of:

  • 9.3 bpm for the Surge during walking
  • 7.4 bpm for the Charge HR during walking
  • 8.5 bpm for the Surge during jogging
  • 5.9 bpm for the Charge HR during jogging

A smaller 2019 study with 20 participants compared the Fitbit Charge 2 to a holter monitor during walking, jogging, and running. The average error rates were:

  • 16.8% during walking
  • 8.9% during running
  • 9.0% during jogging

It‘s important to note that these studies have limitations. Sample sizes are often small, and as a Fitbit spokesperson pointed out in response to the JAMA study, participants‘ wrists were moving substantially more than in typical use cases, which can impact accuracy. But the overall trend suggests that while you can expect reasonable accuracy at rest and during low to moderate intensity activities, Fitbit‘s error rates tend to increase as exercise becomes more vigorous.

Why Accuracy Matters (and When It Matters Most)

For casual fitness tracking and overall health monitoring, Fitbit‘s level of accuracy is likely sufficient for most users. Even with a 10% margin of error, you can still get a good sense of your resting heart rate, see how your body responds to different types of exercise, and recognize concerning outliers or long-term trends that are worth discussing with your doctor.

Where a high degree of precision becomes more important is for people specifically using their heart rate data for training purposes, or those with certain medical conditions that require careful monitoring.

Many runners, cyclists and other endurance athletes use heart rate zones to guide their training. If you‘re trying to stay in a specific range during a workout, even a 5-10 bpm difference can push you from one zone to another. For this use case, investing in a dedicated chest strap monitor that‘s not susceptible to the same motion-related errors as wrist-based trackers is advisable.

For people with cardiovascular conditions like arrhythmias, hypertension, or coronary artery disease, or those at high risk due to factors like smoking or family history, the stakes are even higher. While Fitbit is not a medical device and should never be used for diagnosis or treatment without consulting a doctor, some studies suggest that fitness trackers could play a useful role in preventative care and early detection.

For example, Fitbit‘s heart rate variability (HRV) and sleep apnea tracking features may help identify signs of conditions like atrial fibrillation or sleep disordered breathing, prompting wearers to seek medical attention sooner. Of course, this relies on the data being sufficiently accurate to flag potential issues without causing undue false alarms.

Tips for Getting the Best Readings

While no consumer wearable can match the precision of medical-grade heart rate monitors, there are some best practices that can help you get the most accurate and reliable data from your Fitbit:

  1. Wear it snugly: A loose band allows ambient light to interfere with the sensor. Wear your tracker 2-3 finger widths above your wrist bone, and tight enough that it doesn‘t slide around but not so tight that it‘s uncomfortable.

  2. Experiment with positioning: Some users find they get better readings by wearing the tracker on the inside of the wrist where the skin is thinner and there‘s good blood flow.

  3. Minimize motion: Excessive arm movement, flexing, and gripping can all disrupt readings. If you notice the sensor struggling to get a lock during workouts, try modifying your arm swing or grip.

  4. Give it time to adjust: Especially if you‘re coming from a cold environment or just put the tracker on, give the sensors a few minutes to warm up and stabilize before expecting accurate readings.

  5. Keep it clean: Dirt, sweat, and skin oils can cloud the sensor and impact its performance. Wipe down the back of the tracker regularly with a soft cloth.

It‘s also good to be realistic about the known limitations of wrist-based optical heart rate tracking. Darker skin tones and tattoos can make it harder for the green light to penetrate and get a good reading. And while the technology has improved over time, fast-paced, high-intensity activities are always going to be more challenging to track from the wrist than low to moderate intensity exercise.

The Future of Heart Rate Tracking

While today‘s wrist-based heart rate trackers are far from perfect, I‘m optimistic about where the technology is headed. We‘re already seeing more advanced sensors being incorporated into newer trackers, like the Fitbit Sense‘s multipath optical sensor and electrodermal activity sensor for stress tracking.

Machine learning also has the potential to significantly improve accuracy by adapting algorithms to each user‘s unique physiology and movement patterns over time. And as sensor technology continues to evolve, we may see wearables becoming capable of capturing more nuanced metrics like blood pressure changes, arterial stiffness, and early signs of heart disease.

At the same time, I think it‘s important not to overstate the role of trackers and lose sight of the bigger picture. A healthy heart depends on a lot more than just data collected by a device on your wrist. No amount of tracking can replace the benefits of consistent exercise, a balanced diet, stress management, and regular check-ups with a healthcare provider.

When we become overly fixated on the numbers, we risk losing touch with our body‘s own innate signals and feedback. Heart rate is a helpful metric, but how you actually feel before, during, and after exercise matters just as much, if not more.

So while I‘m excited to see heart rate tracking technology continue to advance and become more accurate, I also hope it will be increasingly viewed as just one tool in a holistic approach to heart health – not a magic bullet solution or a source of undue stress and preoccupation.

In the meantime, if you‘re a Fitbit user, I encourage you to take advantage of the heart rate data available to you, while keeping its limitations in mind. Use it to spot broad trends, keep yourself motivated, and have more informed conversations with your doctor. But also remember to tune into your body‘s other cues, and most importantly, don‘t let pursuit of "perfect" data keep you from enjoying the many benefits of living an active life.