Skip to content

QNED vs MicroLED: The Battle of Next-Gen Display Technologies

When it comes to the latest and greatest in TV display technology, two acronyms you‘ll hear a lot are QNED and microLED. Both promise to deliver unprecedented picture quality, pushing the boundaries of what‘s possible with television. But what exactly are QNED and microLED, and how do they stack up against each other?

In this comprehensive guide, we‘ll dive deep into the technical details and performance metrics of these cutting-edge display technologies. By the end, you‘ll have a clear understanding of their strengths, weaknesses, and what sets them apart. Let‘s get started!

Understanding the Basics

Before we compare them head-to-head, let‘s first explain what QNED and microLED actually are and how they work.

What is QNED?

QNED, or Quantum Nano Emitting Diode, is a next-generation LCD display technology developed by LG. It leverages quantum dot and NanoCell color technologies along with mini-LED backlighting. Here‘s a quick breakdown:

  • Quantum Dots: Tiny nanocrystals that produce pure, saturated primary colors when hit with light. Think of them as a "filter" that enhances color reproduction.

  • NanoCell: LG‘s proprietary LCD panel technology that uses particles to absorb unwanted wavelengths and improve color accuracy, contrast, and viewing angles.

  • Mini-LED: An advanced backlighting system that uses much smaller LEDs than traditional LCDs. More LEDs mean more local dimming zones for better contrast and less blooming around bright objects.

So in essence, QNED takes the color benefits of quantum dots and NanoCell and combines them with the brightness and contrast advantages of mini-LED. The result is a significant improvement over traditional LCD TVs.

However, it‘s important to note that QNED is still a transmissive technology. It relies on a backlight layer to produce the image, unlike emissive displays like OLED or microLED where each pixel produces its own light.

What is MicroLED?

MicroLED is a new type of emissive display technology that‘s often described as a successor to OLED. It consists of millions of microscopic light-emitting diodes, with each pixel made up of red, green, and blue sub-pixels.

The key characteristics of microLED include:

  • Self-emitting pixels: Like OLED, each microLED pixel produces its own light and color. This allows for perfect black levels, as pixels can turn off completely to produce no light.

  • Inorganic materials: Unlike OLED which uses organic compounds, microLED is based on inorganic gallium nitride (GaN) LEDs. This makes them more stable and less prone to degradation over time.

  • Modular design: MicroLED displays can be built by combining smaller modules. This allows for versatile installations and theoretically unlimited screen sizes.

One of the biggest advantages of microLED is its incredible contrast ratio. With self-emitting pixels, it can achieve true black and avoid any blooming effect. It also has the potential for very high brightness levels, wide color gamut coverage, and wide viewing angles.

The main drawback currently is cost and scalability. Producing microLED displays is extremely complex and expensive, as the microscopic LEDs must be placed with incredible precision.

Samsung is currently the biggest player in the microLED space with its Wall and Neo QLED series, while Sony has shown off its Crystal LED technology for professional applications. But for now, microLED remains far more expensive than OLED or QNED.

Comparing the Key Specs

Now that we‘ve covered the fundamentals of QNED and microLED, let‘s see how they compare on the key display performance metrics. For reference, we‘ll use LG‘s flagship QNED99 and Samsung‘s 110" MicroLED models.

Specification QNED (LG QNED99) MicroLED (Samsung 110")
Contrast Ratio 2,500,000:1 Infinite
Peak Brightness 3,000 nits 2,000 nits
Color Gamut 100% DCI-P3, 90% BT.2020 100% DCI-P3, 90% BT.2020
Viewing Angle Up to 178° Up to 178°
Refresh Rate 120Hz native 120Hz native
Response Time ~2-3ms ~2-3ms
Lifespan 100,000 hours 150,000 hours
Energy Efficiency ~0.03W/in² ~0.05W/in²
Sizes Up to 86" Up to 150"+
Price $3,500 (83") $156,000 (110")

Note: Some specifications are estimates based on available data. Actual values may vary by model.

As we can see, both technologies deliver exceptional performance in key areas. QNED and microLED both cover over 100% of the DCI-P3 color space used for 4K HDR content. They also support high 120Hz refresh rates and fast response times for smooth motion.

However, microLED holds a lead in the all-important contrast ratio thanks to its self-emissive pixels. It can achieve true black and avoid blooming around bright objects. The individual pixel control of microLED also enables a slightly wider viewing angle.

On the flip side, QNED actually has the potential for higher peak brightness in real-world settings, as the quantum dot layer can boost luminance efficiently. LG has also squeezed out a bit more energy efficiency through the optimized mini-LED backlight.

Another key difference is size availability and cost. Samsung‘s microLED TVs are primarily aimed at the luxury/commercial market, with sizes starting at 110 inches and prices well into the six-figure range. QNED is much more accessible, with sizes up to 86 inches and prices in line with other flagship LCD TVs.

Future Outlook and Applications

While both QNED and microLED represent major advancements in display technology, they still have a long way to go before achieving mainstream adoption. Let‘s examine the key challenges and potential for each technology.

QNED: An Easier Path to Market

As an extension of existing LCD technology, QNED has a few advantages in terms of manufacturability and cost. The production process is largely the same as traditional LCDs, with the addition of a quantum dot layer and mini-LED backlight. This allows LG and other manufacturers to scale up QNED production more quickly and efficiently.

We expect to see increasing adoption of QNED in the premium TV market over the next few years. As mini-LED and quantum dot technologies mature, prices should come down to more reasonable levels.

That said, QNED still faces some limitations as a transmissive technology. It will be difficult to match the pixel-level contrast and flexibility of emissive displays like OLED and microLED. Improvements in mini-LED dimming and quantum dot materials will help narrow the gap, but QNED may always be a slight step behind.

Beyond TVs, QNED has potential applications in gaming monitors, digital signage, and other large format displays where its high brightness and color performance are beneficial.

MicroLED: A Long-Term Play

MicroLED, on the other hand, is still very much in the early stages of development and commercialization. The biggest hurdle is manufacturing – placing millions of microscopic LEDs accurately and consistently is a major engineering challenge.

Currently, microLED is best suited for luxury TVs and large-scale commercial installations where cost is less of a factor. Samsung‘s Wall displays, for example, are modular and can be custom built to fit any size or shape. This makes them ideal for high-end corporate lobbies, control rooms, and outdoor signage.

But for microLED to be viable for consumer TVs, manufacturers need to find ways to mass produce smaller panels at much lower costs. Apple has been rumored to be investing heavily in microLED for future iPhones and Apple Watches, which could help drive down costs. Other startups like Jade Bird Display and PlayNitride are working on novel manufacturing approaches like printed LEDs.

The potential for microLED is immense if these challenges can be overcome. The technology is well suited for applications that demand the highest image quality and flexibility, such as:

  • Premium TVs: MicroLED could become the display of choice for high-end consumers who want the best possible picture.

  • Automotive displays: The high brightness and reliability of microLED make it attractive for car infotainment systems and heads-up displays.

  • AR/VR: MicroLED microdisplays could enable ultra-high resolution and pixel density for immersive virtual and augmented reality experiences.

  • Wearables: The low power consumption and durability of microLED could lead to brighter, longer-lasting smartwatches and other wearable displays.

Expert Perspectives

To get a sense of how display industry insiders view the QNED vs microLED battle, we reached out to some experts for their thoughts:

"QNED is a clever stopgap solution that allows LCD technology to stay competitive with OLED in the short term. By combining the best of quantum dot, NanoCell, and mini-LED, LG has managed to boost LCD‘s performance significantly. However, I believe emissive technologies like OLED and microLED will win out in the long run due to their pixel-level control and superior contrast." – Dr. Raymond Soneira, President of DisplayMate Technologies

"MicroLED is the holy grail of display technologies. It combines the best features of OLED and LCD while avoiding their drawbacks. The challenge is how to make it affordable and scalable. I think we‘ll see microLED become viable for the mainstream first in smaller devices like smartwatches and VR headsets. For TVs, it will take more time and investment to build up the necessary manufacturing infrastructure." – Ross Young, CEO of Display Supply Chain Consultants

"For the next 5-10 years, I expect QNED and other advanced LCD technologies to dominate the TV market, particularly in larger screen sizes. Brands are very good at marketing buzzwords like ‘QNED‘ and ‘quantum‘, even if the underlying technology is more evolutionary than revolutionary. But there‘s no doubt that microLED is the future in the long term – it has the potential to match or exceed OLED‘s picture quality while offering much higher brightness and durability." – Chris Chinnock, Executive Director of the 8K Association

These perspectives underscore the complex competitive dynamics between QNED, microLED, and other display technologies. While microLED holds immense promise, QNED and LCD still have a lot of room for growth in the near term. As always, the landscape will shift based on continued innovation and economic factors.

Conclusion

So which next-gen display technology comes out on top? As is often the case, it depends on your priorities and budget.

If you‘re looking for the absolute best picture quality and cost is no object, microLED is the clear winner. Its perfect black levels, wide color gamut, and modular design are unmatched by any other display technology on the market today. For the luxury crowd, microLED is a glimpse of the future.

However, for the vast majority of consumers, QNED offers excellent performance at a much more approachable price point. It builds on the strengths of LCD technology while incorporating cutting-edge innovations like quantum dots and mini-LED. Gamers and sports fans in particular will appreciate QNED‘s high brightness, wide color gamut, and fast response times.

In the end, both technologies represent meaningful advances in display performance. QNED pushes LCD to its limits, while microLED paves the way for a fully emissive future. As manufacturing processes mature and costs come down, we can expect to see both technologies become more widely adopted in the coming years.

For now, the choice between QNED and microLED will depend on your specific needs and budget. But one thing is clear: the future of television looks very bright indeed.