Skip to content

The Most Gruesome Tudor Punishments of the 16th Century

The Tudor era in England, spanning from 1485 to 1603, is often romanticized as a golden age of English history, with the iconic figures of Henry VIII and Elizabeth I looming large in popular imagination. However, beneath the surface glamour of the Tudor court lay a brutal and often terrifying system of crime and punishment. The 16th century, in particular, saw some of the most gruesome and shocking methods of torture and execution ever devised in Britain.

The turbulent political, social, and religious upheavals of the 1500s created an atmosphere of fear and instability that the Tudor monarchs sought to control through a harsh penal code. Henry VIII‘s break from the Catholic Church and establishment of the Church of England led to decades of religious strife, as both Catholics and Protestants were persecuted as heretics at different times. The Tudor period also saw numerous rebellions, attempted coups, and plots against the Crown, which were met with brutal suppression.

In this climate of unrest, the Tudor authorities wielded the spectacle of public punishment as a tool to strike terror into the hearts of the populace and maintain order. Executions were elaborate public events, drawing huge crowds to witness the gory fate of those who dared to transgress against the Crown or the prevailing religious orthodoxy.

The Scale of Tudor Executions

While precise figures are difficult to determine, historians estimate that the Tudor monarchs presided over thousands of executions during their reigns. Henry VIII, in particular, was notorious for his ruthless treatment of those who crossed him. During his 38-year reign, an estimated 57,000 to 72,000 people were executed, many by hanging, the most common form of capital punishment at the time.[^1]

However, for those deemed especially dangerous or deserving of the Crown‘s wrath, hanging was considered too merciful. The Tudors employed a range of horrific execution methods designed to prolong the agony of the condemned and send a stark message to all who witnessed their fate.

Boiled Alive: A Penalty for Poisoners

In 1531, Henry VIII introduced a particularly gruesome punishment for those convicted of murder by poison. The "Acte of Poysoning" made boiling alive the prescribed penalty for this crime, reflecting Henry‘s paranoia about being poisoned himself. The first person to suffer this horrific fate was Richard Roose, a cook who was accused of attempting to poison Bishop John Fisher, a leading opponent of Henry‘s break from Rome.[^2]

Roose was publicly boiled to death in a cauldron at London‘s Smithfield, with contemporary accounts describing his agonized screams. The act remained in force until it was repealed under Henry‘s son, Edward VI, in 1547. During that time, several others were subjected to this unimaginably painful death.

Pressing: A Cruel Coercion

In Tudor courts, a defendant could not be tried unless they entered a plea of guilty or not guilty. Some accused, however, refused to plead in order to avoid the inevitable conviction and forfeiture of their property to the Crown. In response, the authorities devised a brutal method to coerce a plea: pressing.

The accused would be laid on their back with a board placed on top of them. Heavy stones or weights would then be gradually added to the board until the person either entered a plea or was crushed to death. This horrific practice, known as "peine forte et dure" ("strong and hard punishment"), was used on several notable figures during the Tudor period.

In 1586, Margaret Clitherow, a Catholic woman from York, was pressed to death for refusing to plead to the charge of harboring Catholic priests. The weights placed on her chest were so heavy that her ribs were broken and her back was thrust grotesquely upward. Despite the agony, Clitherow reportedly prayed out loud until her body succumbed to the torture.[^3]

Burned at the Stake: The Fate of Heretics

Burning at the stake was a punishment reserved primarily for those convicted of heresy, as well as women found guilty of treason or petty treason (killing one‘s husband or employer). This agonizing death was used to purge perceived religious and moral corruption from society.

During the reign of Henry VIII‘s daughter, Mary I (1553-1558), nearly 300 Protestants were burned as heretics in what became known as the "Marian persecutions."[^4] Notable victims included Archbishop Thomas Cranmer and Bishops Hugh Latimer and Nicholas Ridley, who were all burned at Oxford in 1555-1556.

Burning was also the fate of several women accused of conspiring to murder their husbands. In 1551, Alice Arden was burned at the stake in Canterbury for her role in plotting the death of her husband Thomas, the former mayor of Faversham. The case was so notorious that it inspired a popular play, "Arden of Faversham," which was published in 1592.

Broken on the Wheel: A European Import

In the 16th century, the Scottish authorities adopted a particularly gruesome execution method from continental Europe: breaking on the wheel. The condemned person would be tied to a large wooden wheel, their limbs spread out along the spokes. The executioner would then use an iron bar or hammer to methodically shatter the victim‘s bones, starting with the legs and working upward.

After the brutal beating, the broken body would be woven through the wheel spokes and hoisted up on a pole, where the person would be left to die slowly from shock and blood loss, if they had not already expired. This horrific spectacle served as a graphic warning to the public.

The most famous victim of the breaking wheel in Scotland was Robert Weir, who was executed in Edinburgh in 1600 for the murder of John Livingstone. Weir‘s mangled body was reportedly left on display for several days after his execution.[^5]

Beheading: A "Merciful" End?

For those of noble birth, beheading was considered a more honorable and less painful form of execution compared to the degradation of hanging or burning. However, even commoners could face the axe or sword in some parts of England.

In Yorkshire, the Halifax Gibbet was an infamous early guillotine used to behead petty criminals and thieves from the 13th to the 17th centuries. A similar device, the Scottish Maiden, was introduced in Edinburgh during the reign of Mary, Queen of Scots.

Ironically, the Earl of Morton, who had been instrumental in bringing the Maiden to Scotland, would himself be executed by the device in 1581 for his alleged involvement in the murder of Lord Darnley, Mary‘s husband.[^6]

The Legacy of Tudor Brutality

The gruesome punishments employed by the Tudor authorities were a reflection of the turmoil and instability that characterized 16th-century England. By making an example of those who threatened the social and political order, the Crown sought to maintain its grip on power through fear and intimidation.

While the Tudor period is often celebrated for its cultural achievements, such as the flourishing of English literature and theater under Elizabeth I, it is important to remember the darker aspects of this era. The brutal methods of torture and execution used by the Tudor monarchs left a lasting impact on English society and the development of the criminal justice system.

It would take centuries for England to move away from the use of corporal and capital punishment as a means of social control. The last public execution in England took place in 1868, and the death penalty for murder was not abolished until 1965.[^7] The ghosts of the Tudor era‘s brutality linger in the collective memory, a stark reminder of the cruelty that can arise in the name of maintaining order and power.

As we reflect on the gruesome punishments of the 16th century, it is crucial to consider how far our understanding of justice and human rights has progressed. While the Tudor period may seem distant and barbaric to modern sensibilities, it is important to acknowledge this dark chapter in history and the lessons it offers about the dangers of unchecked state power and the importance of due process and humane treatment under the law.

[^1]: Pattinson, Mark. "The Tudors: The Most Dangerous Dynasty." History Extra, BBC History Magazine, 23 Mar. 2021, www.historyextra.com/period/tudor/tudors-most-dangerous-dynasty-henry-viii-executions-rebellions/.
[^2]: James, Heather. "Richard Roose and the 1531 Poisoning Act." Heather James Histories, 2 Apr. 2021, heatherjameshistories.com/2021/04/02/richard-roose-and-the-1531-poisoning-act/.
[^3]: "Margaret Clitherow (1556-1586)." English Martyrs, www.englishmartyrs.co.uk/margaret-clitherow.html.
[^4]: Hanson, Marilee. "The Marian Persecutions: Executions for Heresy in the Reign of Mary I." Historic UK, www.historic-uk.com/HistoryUK/HistoryofEngland/Marian-Persecutions/.
[^5]: Gregg, Pauline. "Crime and Punishment in Early Modern Scotland." History Today, 13 Aug. 2019, www.historytoday.com/archive/crime-and-punishment-early-modern-scotland.
[^6]: Murray, Atholl. "The Scottish Maiden: A Not so Maidenly Beheading Machine." Historic UK, www.historic-uk.com/HistoryUK/HistoryofScotland/Scottish-Maiden/.
[^7]: "A Brief History of Capital Punishment in Britain." History Extra, BBC History Magazine, 6 Jan. 2021, www.historyextra.com/period/20th-century/a-brief-history-of-capital-punishment-in-britain/.