Skip to content

RAID 1 vs RAID 5: A Complete Comparison

Redundant Array of Independent Disks (RAID) is a technology that allows combining multiple physical disk drives into a single logical drive to provide increased storage capacity, performance, and redundancy for important data. Two of the most popular RAID levels are RAID 1 and RAID 5, which take quite different approaches to managing multiple drives. This comprehensive guide will compare RAID 1 vs RAID 5 to help you determine which solution makes the most sense for your storage needs.

What is RAID 1?

RAID 1 is one of the simplest RAID levels, using disk mirroring to copy and maintain identical copies of data on two or more disks. This replicates the data exactly across the RAID 1 array.

The minimum number of hard drives required for RAID 1 is 2, with one disk containing the actual data and the other disk containing the mirror copy of that data. While 2 drives is enough for protection via mirroring, more drives can be added to increase read performance. However, the capacity of a RAID 1 array is equal to the size of the smallest disk in the array, as copies are written to all disks simultaneously.

Key Advantages of RAID 1:

  • Excellent performance and speed for reads, as data can be accessed in parallel from multiple disks
  • Very high data protection and fault tolerance – if one drive fails, a mirror copy of the data still exists on the other disks
  • Easy to set up and manage
  • Can use disks of different sizes, though capacity will be limited by the smallest disk

Disadvantages include:

  • Very high disk overhead as you need at least 2x total capacity – half is for data, half for the mirrors
  • Slower performance for write operations compared to other RAID levels since data has to be written twice
  • Rebuilding a failed drive can take longer compared to a RAID 5 array

Overall, RAID 1 is an excellent choice when data protection and fault tolerance are critical, such as for databases or other mission-critical data. The redundancy comes at a high storage capacity cost, but RAID 1 performs well for reads while still protecting data if drives fail.

What is RAID 5?

RAID 5 provides an alternate approach, using block-level striping with distributed parity. This means data is spread across multiple disks in blocks, alongside parity information calculated across the same stripes of data.

The key advantage of RAID 5 is it requires a minimum of 3 hard drives, allowing better use of storage capacity compared to mirroring. With a 3 drive RAID 5 array, 1 drive can be lost without losing access to data. The equivalent would be a 4 disk RAID 10 array.

Some key high points of RAID 5 include:

  • Implements striping and distributed parity, which allows better use of combined storage than RAID 1 mirroring
  • Requires a minimum of 3 disks, with best performance on arrays of 4+ disks
  • Very high data protection with ability to withstand a single disk failure
  • Good performance for large reads and writes due to striping across multiple disks
  • Write speeds slower than reads, due to parity calculation requirement

Disadvantages of this RAID level are:

  • RAID rebuild after drive failure is more complex compared to a mirror (RAID 1)
  • The loss of a second drive during rebuild may result in data loss
  • Lower performance for write-heavy workloads compared to RAID 10

The distributed parity approach makes RAID 5 storage both efficient and redundant. It is a preferred choice for storage environments that require both data protection and maximizing total capacity.

Key Differences Between RAID Levels

While both RAID 1 and RAID 5 provide forms of redundancy to protect data, they achieve this in very different ways. Some key differences include:

Minimum Drives Required

  • RAID 1: 2 drives
  • RAID 5: 3 drives

Redundancy and Fault Tolerance

  • RAID 1: Complete redundancy through mirrored copies. Can withstand multiple drive losses with larger arrays.
  • RAID 5: Single drive fault tolerance. A second drive lost during rebuild risks data loss.

Performance

  • RAID 1: Excellent reads, slower writes due to mirroring overhead
  • RAID 5: Fast reads and writes due to striping, but slower than RAID 10

Storage Efficiency

  • RAID 1: Very low, 50% maximum usable capacity
  • RAID 5: High efficiency, (N-1)/N usable capacity

Ease of Setup

  • RAID 1: Very simple to set up and manage
  • RAID 5: More complex, requires parity calculation

Cost

  • RAID 1: Higher overall storage costs due to mirroring overhead
  • RAID 5: Lowest storage cost for arrays needing redundancy

As you can see, RAID 1 and RAID 5 take philosophical opposite approaches. RAID 1 optimizes for redundancy and fault tolerance while RAID 5 is optimized for storage efficiency.

When to Choose Each RAID Level

With the differences detailed above, you may be wondering which RAID level is the "best" choice overall. In reality, there is no singular best RAID type – it depends on your specific storage environment and data protection needs.

Here is guidance on when to choose RAID 1 or RAID 5:

RAID 1

RAID 1 pairs best with:

  • Environments needing "belt and suspenders" redundancy to maximize fault tolerance
  • Applications requiring high performance for large reads such as databases
  • Smaller storage environments where simplicity is preferred
  • Business-critical data where multiple redundant copies are essential

RAID 5

RAID 5 is ideally suited for:

  • Storage environments requiring efficiency, redundancy, and moderate capacity
  • Applications with more balanced read/write loads
  • Larger arrays where storage capacity is at a premium
  • Archival data and backups where some redundancy is beneficial

If both redundancy AND maximum performance are required, RAID 10 is an excellent combinatin of RAID 1 mirroring plus RAID 0 striping. But it comes at an even higher storage overhead than RAID 1 alone.

Rebuilding RAID Arrays After Drive Failure

An important consideration for any redundant RAID setup is the rebuild process required after a disk failure. When a drive fails in a RAID 1 or RAID 5 array, rebuilding the lost data needs to occur before another disk is lost. Otherwise data may be corrupted or lost entirely.

Rebuilding a RAID 1 array is a relatively simple process. Since a complete mirrored copy exists on the remaining disks, the RAID controller just needs to copy that mirror data to the replacement drive. This can be done drive-to-drive, not requiring access of existing array data.

The RAID 5 rebuild process is more complex and puts significantly more stress on the array. It requires reading ALL remaining disks in the RAID 5 set in order to rebuild the lost data and parity information on the new replacement disk. This rebuild process on RAID 5 arrays takes much longer than RAID 1. It also exposes the risk of data loss if additional disk failures occur before the rebuild completes. For these reasons many storage experts recommend RAID 6 instead of RAID 5 for the additional parity protection.

Expanding RAID Arrays

Most RAID implementations also support expanding your existing disk arrays with additional storage capacity. For RAID 1, this is a simple process – just add another pair of identical disks to the mirror set. The RAID controller automatically adds the extra space.

Expanding a RAID 5 array requires a full migration, backing up the data to a temporary location. The RAID 5 array is then rebuilt from scratch with the new expanded capacity. Data is copied back to the new RAID 5 set. This more disruptive process highlights another advantage of RAID 1 arrays – expanding storage is much simpler.

Pros and Cons of RAID 1 and RAID 5

RAID 1 Advantages

  • Simple mirroring for easy setup and rebuilding
  • Fast read performance
  • Excellent fault tolerance
  • Easy to expand capacity

RAID 1 Disadvantages

  • Very low storage efficiency – 50% max usable capacity
  • Slower write performance than RAID 5 or RAID 10
  • Higher storage cost for usable capacity

RAID 5 Advantages

  • Good read performance via striping
  • High storage efficiency with (Nāˆ’1)/N usable capacity
  • Strong protection against single disk failure
  • Lowest storage cost for arrays requiring redundancy

RAID 5 Disadvantages

  • Slower write performance due to parity calculation
  • Increased risk of data loss during rebuilds
  • More complicated setup and expansion

RAID 10 Combined Mirroring & Striping

While not covered in depth here, RAID 10 delivers excellent performance by combining both RAID 1 mirroring and RAID 0 striping together. This provides speed advantages through striping while maintaining multiple copies via RAID 1 mirrors. The downside is very high storage costs, at a minimum of 4x drives. But for applications needing both high speed AND redundancy, RAID 10 is an excellent fit.

Common RAID 1 and RAID 5 Questions

Which RAID level is inherently faster for random reads?
RAID 1 will provide lower latency and therefore the best performance for random reads across multiple disks.

Which RAID level requires the most physical hard drives?
RAID 1 has a minimum requirement of 2 physical drives, while RAID 5 requires at least 3 drives minimum due to the dedicated parity drive. RAID 10 would require the most at a minimum of 4 physical disks.

What RAID level provides the highest data redundancy?
RAID 1 provides the highest level of redundancy, via complete copies of data mirrored across multiple disks. This allows RAID 1 arrays to withstand multiple simultaneous disk failures by design.

Which RAID level offers the best usable storage capacity vs redundancy?
Due to its distributed parity approach, RAID 5 provides excellent storage efficiency while still maintaining redundancy equivalent to a single disk loss. RAID 5 arrays can utilize (N-1)/N of total capacity for actual data storage.

I hope this detailed overview has helped explain the key similarities, differences, pros and cons between RAID 1 and RAID 5 setups. If you have any other questions, feel free to ask in the comments!