Skip to content

The Ins and Outs of Blacklists in Computing

If you‘ve ever encountered a bouncer firmly telling you "you‘re not on the list," you have a basic idea of how blacklists work in the digital world. In computing, a blacklist is a way to block or deny something – whether that‘s a specific application, user, website, or IP address.

Blacklists can be a useful tool in the cybersecurity toolbox, especially for preventing access to known-malicious entities. However, blacklists alone are not a complete security solution. Crafting an effective blacklist requires ongoing time and effort, and determined adversaries can often find ways to circumvent them.

In this deep dive, we‘ll explore what blacklists are, how they‘re used, their benefits and limitations, and how organizations can employ blacklisting as part of a layered defense strategy. By the end, you‘ll have a comprehensive understanding of this longstanding but sometimes controversial cybersecurity mechanism.

Blacklists 101

At the most basic level, a blacklist in computing is a list of entities that are blocked, banned, or denied in some way. If an entity is "blacklisted," it means any attempt by that entity to gain access or connect will be rejected by default.

Some common applications of blacklists include:

  • Preventing certain applications from running on a system
  • Denying specific users from accessing network resources
  • Blocking traffic to and from particular IP addresses or domains
  • Filtering out emails from known spam senders

The opposite of a blacklist is a whitelist – rather than denying everything except what is explicitly allowed, a whitelist allows nothing except what is explicitly approved. Whitelisting can be a more secure model but requires careful curation.

Flavors of Blacklists

Let‘s explore some of the most common types of blacklists you‘ll encounter:

Application Blacklists

Application blacklists (sometimes called software restriction policies) are used to prevent certain programs from running on a system. This is commonly used in enterprise and educational environments to keep users focused and productive.

For example, a company may blacklist social media apps and games on work devices to eliminate distractions. A school may use application blacklisting to prevent students from accessing inappropriate content or circumventing safety restrictions.

While effective at blocking casual misuse, application blacklists can be bypassed by savvy users. Blacklists also require constant updating as new applications emerge.

Network User Blacklists

Network user blacklists restrict what resources a specific user (or group of users) can access on the network. Administrators can blacklist users at the network level as part of the principle of least privilege – only granting access to the bare minimum resources a user needs to perform their role.

However, user blacklists alone are not foolproof. Skilled attackers may still be able to exploit gaps to gain a foothold. User blacklists are best used in combination with other controls like network segmentation and access monitoring.

Domain and IP Blacklists

One of the most widespread applications of blacklisting is blocking malicious websites and IP addresses at the network perimeter. This can help prevent users from accidentally accessing known-bad domains that distribute malware or steal information.

Domain and IP blacklists are typically maintained by security vendors and updated frequently as new threats emerge. However, they are always a step behind attackers, who constantly generate new infrastructure. Blacklists should be combined with real-time threat intelligence and behavioral analysis to catch brand new and evasive threats.

Behind the Blacklist

So how are blacklists actually created and applied? The process generally involves a few key steps:

  1. Identification – Entities to be blacklisted must first be identified, either through automated analysis (e.g. IP reputation feeds) or manual research. Identifiers could be file hashes, URLs, IP addresses, email senders, etc.

  2. Aggregation – Raw blacklist data from various feeds and sources is aggregated into a centralized list or database. The blacklist may be broken up into different categories based on threat type.

  3. Distribution – The curated blacklist is distributed to enforcement points like endpoint agents, network devices, or email gateways. This could be through direct push or pull mechanisms.

  4. Enforcement – Security controls cross-reference the blacklist to automatically deny any matches. Enforcement is usually configurable, with options to alert, block, or quarantine blacklisted items.

  5. Maintenance – Blacklists must be continually updated as new threats are discovered and existing threats evolve. An out-of-date blacklist rapidly loses effectiveness as attackers register new domains and hop to new infrastructure.

In mature organizations, the blacklisting workflow is highly automated through dedicated threat intelligence platforms. However, there is always a human element – ultimate decisions about what goes on the blacklist lie with security teams and stakeholders.

Limitations of Blacklisting

While blacklists can be a powerful tool, they have some significant limitations and drawbacks to be aware of:

  • Blacklists are inherently reactive and one step behind attackers
  • Maintaining comprehensive, up-to-date blacklists is time and resource intensive
  • Blacklists can cause business disruption if legitimate entities are inadvertently blocked (false positives)
  • Skilled adversaries can often circumvent blacklists through techniques like domain generation algorithms (DGAs)
  • Blacklists don‘t prevent insider threats or compromised accounts/devices already "trusted" on the network
  • Over-reliance on blacklists leads to a false sense of security and complacency

For these reasons, most experts agree that blacklisting alone is not sufficient as a primary security control. Blacklists work best as part of a layered defense-in-depth strategy.

Blacklists and Beyond

If blacklists aren‘t a silver bullet, what alternatives and complementary approaches should organizations consider?

Whitelisting

Whitelisting operates under the principle of denying everything by default and only allowing approved entities. Application whitelisting can be highly effective at locking down systems. However, this can cause major business friction if access needs aren‘t carefully defined. Whitelisting also requires just as much maintenance as blacklisting to remain effective.

User Training

Improving users‘ security awareness can reduce the risk of them engaging with malicious sites, links, and attachments in the first place. Teaching users to think before they click and to be wary of unsolicited outreach can greatly strengthen an organization‘s security posture. However, training alone won‘t stop the most persistent threats.

Principle of Least Privilege

Enforcing the principle of least privilege (POLP) ensures that users only have the bare minimum permissions needed to perform their role. This can contain the blast radius of incidents and make it harder for attackers to spread laterally. Privileged access management solutions can help automate POLP.

Defense in Depth

Defense in depth involves layering multiple independent security controls so that if one fails, others still stand in the way. By combining preventative, detective, and corrective controls across different attack surfaces, organizations can build resilience against a wide range of threats.

The Future of Blacklisting

As we‘ve seen, blacklisting still has a role to play in modern cybersecurity, but its limitations are becoming more apparent. Attackers are constantly finding new ways to evade static defenses. At the same time, the attack surface is expanding as organizations adopt cloud services and support remote work.

Going forward, expect to see a continued shift towards more dynamic, behavior-based approaches to threat detection and response. For example, rather than (or in addition to) blocking a hardcoded list of IP addresses, a next-gen firewall might analyze traffic patterns in real-time to identify and block anomalous activity.

Machine learning will also increasingly augment threat intelligence, enabling security tools to adapt and learn from new attack patterns on the fly. Blacklists will be used more as a first line of defense and source of ground truth rather than the primary decision point.

Key Takeaways

We‘ve covered a lot of ground in this overview of blacklisting. Here are the key points to remember:

  • Blacklists are lists of known-bad entities that are blocked by default
  • Common targets for blacklisting include applications, users, domains, and IP addresses
  • Blacklists require constant care and feeding to stay relevant against evolving threats
  • Blacklists work best as part of a defense-in-depth strategy alongside other controls like whitelisting, user training, and privilege management
  • Going forward, blacklisting will be increasingly supplemented by behavioral approaches as the threat landscape continues to shift

No matter what mix of controls you employ, blacklisting remains a fundamental cybersecurity concept that every practitioner should understand. Hopefully this guide has given you a solid foundation to build on as you navigate the ever-changing world of IT security.