Skip to content

The Rise and Fall of 3D TVs

Hi there! Today I‘m going to walk you through the intriguing history of the short-lived 3D TV craze. What was once heralded as the future of television became obsolete in just a few years. Let‘s dive into the rapid rise and fall of 3D TVs.

The story begins all the way back in the 1920s, when the first 3D broadcast wowed audiences by taking televised images into the third dimension. But the 3D hype quickly faded as limitations in the technology became clear. Bulky headsets and eye strain gave 3D a bad reputation.

Things changed in 2009. Avatar‘s 3D digital effects were a sight to behold for moviegoers. With new 3D technology eliminating headaches and improving image quality, Avatar became the highest grossing film worldwide. Sensing an opportunity, TV manufacturers raced to bring 3D into households around the world.

The 3D TV revolution kicked off in 2010 at the Consumer Electronics Show, where brands like Samsung, Sony, and Panasonic unveiled their 3D television lineups. Early sales results were extremely promising:

3D TV shipment volumes from 2010 to 2012

3D TV shipments skyrocketed from 2.26 million units in 2010 to over 40 million by 2012. [Source: Statista]

But the optimism was short-lived. As you can see in the chart above, shipments stagnated by 2013 and declined thereafter. By 2016, the world had moved on from 3D TVs. What led to this remarkably fast rise and fall?

The 3D Glasses Conundrum

A key reason that 3D TVs didn‘t stick in households was the glasses. Two main types of 3D glasses each came with significant downsides:

Active 3D glasses – Used battery-powered LCD shutters to open and close lenses rapidly to produce a 3D effect. This created sharp, high-quality 3D images. However, active glasses were heavy, expensive ($100+ per pair), required charging, and caused eye strain from flickering.

Passive 3D glasses – Used polarized plastic lenses, which made them lighter and cheaper. But they caused more 3D blurring and ghosting effects.

Either way, having to wear clunky, annoying glasses to watch TV in your own home just wasn‘t appealing. Glasses made 3D viewing feel like a chore.

Limited Optimal Viewing Angles

Since TV screens are small compared to theater screens, they have narrower optimal viewing angles. With 3D TVs, you had to sit directly centered in front of the screen to get the proper 3D perspective. Turn your head or sit at an angle, and the 3D effect disappeared.

This severely constrained 3D TV‘s appeal for household use. Regular TV watching often involves groups of people sitting in different viewing positions. And few people want to wear 3D glasses for hours if they‘re just leaving the TV on in the background.

Lack of 3D Content

While Hollywood experimented with 3D films and some nature documentaries showcased 3D video, there simply wasn‘t enough 3D programming available to justify buying a specialty 3D TV.

According to a 2012 consumer survey on 3D TV adoption, 61% of respondents said there was not enough 3D content available, and 55% were unhappy with the quality. [Source: NPD Group] Paying extra for limited, gimmicky 3D content didn‘t add sufficient value.

The Rise of 4K TV

As 3D TV declined, Ultra High Definition 4K TVs began gaining steam. These provided tangible picture improvements without needing glasses. As more content switched from HD to 4K, consumers found that resolution and image quality made more of a difference than 3D gimmicks.

By 2016, global shipments reflected this change:

4K TV shipments rapidly overtook 3D models. [Source: Statista]

It was game over for buggy 3D. The technology had tried to revolutionize home entertainment, but fizzled out fast due to its limitations.

Is 3D Down for the Count?

While 3D TV seems long gone, some signs point to a possible comeback:

  • Glasses-free 3D TVs are overcoming past viewing angle problems using autostereoscopic tech that requires no glasses. Large scale production could make these affordable.

  • New display technologies like OLED provide the fast response times needed for high fidelity 3D.

  • 3D movies are still being released, and may get a boost from the pending Avatar sequel.

  • VR headsets like Oculus are reviving consumer enthusiasm for immersive 3D, especially for gaming.

The appetite for quality 3D content remains. The issue has been effectively and comfortably delivering 3D into the living room. But rapid technological leaps can still happen. 3D may rise again once the right mixture of display tech, cost, and content aligns. Will the third time end up being the charm for 3D TVs? Only time will tell.

Thanks for sticking with me on this 3D rollercoaster ride. Let me know if you have any other thoughts on the history of 3D television!

Join the conversation

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *