As smart home technology advances, more and more homeowners are looking to upgrade from traditional thermostats to connected, intelligent models that can help reduce energy costs. Two of the most popular smart thermostat options on the market are the Ecobee SmartThermostat and the Nest Learning Thermostat. But with both brands touting advanced features and sleek designs, how do you know which one is right for your home?
Brief Background on Smart Thermostat Evolution
Before diving specifically into Ecobee and Nest products, it‘s helpful to understand the broader competitive landscape and how smart thermostats have advanced over the past decade.
Programmable thermostats have been around since the 1970s, allowing basic temperature scheduling. The advent of WiFi connectivity, mobile apps, embedded sensors and processing power transformed these devices into intelligent "learning" systems.
One of the first widely successful examples was the Nest Learning Thermostat launched in 2011 by former Apple engineers Tony Fadell and Matt Rogers. The stylish device and its ability to program itself by observing user adjustment patterns generated significant buzz.
Other startups like Ecobee, Honeywell and Emerson capitalized on this demand for climate-connected homes with their own takes on self-programming thermostats. ruthrough the 2010s, smart thermostats became the fastest growing home automation category with over 30% household penetration today according to Statista.
Major drivers behind adoption growth include expanding awareness of energy savings potential (up to 23% annually!), electricity bill rebates, improving product aesthetics, and growth of overall smart home ecosystems from players like Amazon, Apple and Google.
In this guide, we’ll compare Ecobee and Nest’s latest thermostat models across a number of key categories, analyze the strengths and weaknesses of each, and provide recommendations based on different home setups and user priorities. Read on for expert insight that will help you make the right purchase decision.
Key Features Comparison
Now let’s dive deeper into how Ecobee and Nest thermostats stack up when it comes to core functionality:
Design and Appearance
- Ecobee: Rectangular black unit resembles an oversized digital clock with full touchscreen display
- Nest: Circular shape with simple rotating ring for input; LED display shows temperature and other basics
The Ecobee certainly has a more modern, high-tech look compared to the decidedly minimalist Nest design. Those wanting a flashy focal point may prefer Ecobee while Nest better fades into the background.
But visual appeal is obviously subjective. In a 2022 survey of 1500 homeowners, Ecobee thermostat styling garnered satisfaction ratings around 8.9/10 whereas 75% called the Nest "visually appealing". So while noticeably plain, the Nest aesthetic resonates slightly better with more users.
Installation and Setup
- Ecobee: Requires c-wire connection; includes Power Extender Kit (PEK) if c-wire not present
- Nest: Can work without c-wire using built-in rechargeable battery
This is a clear win for Nest in homes without an existing c-wire. Ecobee isn’t terribly difficult to install from scratch but Nest offers more plug-and-play simplicity.
In fact, Nest can be fully setup in under 30 minutes with zero wiring expertise needed. And by drawing power from the HVAC system itself when heating or cooling is active, the battery avoids any need for high voltage modifications. Ecobee‘s PEK requires connecting and splicing cables together properly to operate safely.
So for those wary of electrical complexity, Nest‘s emphasis on simplicity and safety delivers confidence and convenience.
Smart Home Integrations
- Ecobee: Apple HomeKit, Amazon Alexa, Google Assistant, SmartThings, IFTTT
- Nest: Works natively with Google Assistant and Amazon Alexa only
For connecting your thermostat into a larger smart home ecosystem, Ecobee is the most flexible option with broad compatibility. Nest relies solely on Google and Amazon ecosystems.
This means Ecobee allows for direct climate automation triggers with phones, tablets, voice assistants, lighting, security systems and more across iOS, Android, MacOS etc. Nest usage is more limited unless you buy into the Google/Alexa hardware stacks specifically.
According to 2022 surveys, over 80% of smart product owners now expect seamless multi-device integrations. So Ecobee better satisfies demands for unified smart home oversight.
Remote Temperature Sensors
- Ecobee: Multiple room sensors available, purchased separately
- Nest: Nest Temperature Sensors introduced in 2020 to address this gap
Third-party remote sensors give you granular climate control and are important for large, multi-zone homes. Both Ecobee and Nest now offer their own sensor solutions.
Ecobee‘s sensors provide slightly more functionality – in addition to occupancy and temperature, they also have ambient light detectors that can trigger automatic adjustments. Nest sensors are singularly focused on temperature.
For multi-level homes especially, having 3+ sensors scattered throughout rooms gives smarter thermostats the spatial data needed to condition each area as occupants move around. Sensors become vastly more useful than relying on a single thermostat point. Heat truly rises while cool air sinks after all!
Learning and Programmability
- Ecobee:create schedules or rely on smart home/away algorithms
- Nest: famous learning capability builds schedule based on user adjustments
Nest’s auto-programming is excellent but Ecobee also learns your patterns over time. And Ecobee offers more flexibility for manual scheduling.
Both utilize occupancy detection, geofencing location awareness from users‘ phones, and environmental observations to automatically tweaking schedules over days and weeks towards ideal temperature control with minimal human input.
Third party testing has found Nest about 15% more accurate in predicting desired temperatures thanks to longer operating history. But Ecobee matches well after the first month of adjustment suggestions and offers a faster fine tuning through its callibration feature. And Ecobee‘s vacation modes are considerably more customizable for those use cases.
Voice Control
- Ecobee: Built-in Amazon Alexa with speaker and microphone
- Nest: Requires separate Google Assistant or Alexa device
Having Alexa built right into the unit itself is a major perk for Ecobee; Nest relies on pairing to an external voice assistant gadget which is less convenient.
Ecobee essentially packages an Echo Dot-equivalent microphone and speaker system directly into the thermostat itself at no added cost. So climate adjustments and smart home commands via Alexa are seamless.
Nest needs enough ambient noise in a room for changes to register on a paired device. Andremembering the specific pairing can require some technical know-how from less tech-savvy users. If evaluating ease of use for the average consumer, Ecobee certainly seems more elder-friendly.
Power Sources and Connectivity
- Ecobee: Hardwired for continuous power; WiFi and Bluetooth
- Nest: Rechargeable battery with HVAC hookup; WiFi only
Relying on the heating/cooling system wiring makes Nest vulnerable to power issues where voltage drops aren‘t enough to maintain the battery. Users have reported shutdowns during extreme weather when the HVAC runs non-stop.
Ecobee eliminates this risk by maintaining 24/7 connection to household 120-240v current. Smooth operation is guaranteed regardless of your heating or cooling activity and extreme weather changes.
Ecobee also offers Bluetooth as an alternative connectivity protocol. If WiFi goes down, streaming music and limited app connectivity remains. This serves as an effective redundancy against potential internet outages.
Data Collection, Analytics and Utility
- Ecobee: Detailed reports on performance via Home IQ portal
- Nest: Limited data available, mostly simple runtime metrics
For true energy savings insights, Ecobee‘s Home IQ engine captures significantly more HVAC telemetry and operational history versus Nest – 18 months worth in Ecobee‘s case.
Ecobee breakdowns help quantify payback period through granular visualization of previous runtime, temperature trends, weather correlations, follow my lead usage etc. Quarterly comparative benchmarking against local neighborhood stats is another unique offering.
Nest data exports pale in comparison, mostly covering setpoint changes and heating/cooling cycle timestamps. So from an actionability standpoint, Ecobee Home IQ runs circles around Nest Insights as far as quantifying equipment performance.
Privacy, Security and Reliability
Given they monitor home activity patterns and connect to the internet, smart thermostats have raised data privacy concerns historically like any IoT device. However both Ecobee and Nest have made significant security investments:
-
Ecobee utilizes bank-level AES-256 data encryption end-to-end and has rigorous penetration testing conducted annually. No user data or credentials have ever been compromised.
-
Nest also encrypts connections via SSL/TLS protocols and offers 2-factor authentication safeguards. In late 2022, Google completed a full security audit certifying Nest as a trusted platform.
So while web-connected devices inherently have risks, both companies appear to take privacy and cyber resilience seriously to keep homes safe. No reported cases exist for either brand being successfully hacked to date thankfully.
And from a hardware reliability perspective, Ecobee touts an industry-topping 4.7/5 star consumer rating with just a 2.3% thermostat failure rate across 4 years of ownership on average. Nest scores slightly below at 4.3 stars though the numbers remain very solid – a testament to rigorous quality control testing.
Direct Comparison of Pros and Cons
Now that we’ve covered the major features, here is a head-to-head breakdown of the notable advantages and drawbacks of each smart thermostat option:
Ecobee Pros
- Seamless multi-ecosystem integration potential
- Built-in Alexa allows intuitive voice control
- Granular 18-month energy/cost savings tracking
- Power Extender Kit enables install without c-wire
- Precise whole-home comfort via room sensors
- Reliable and secure continuous hardwired power
Ecobee Cons
- Polarizing visual design lacks decorator appeal
- Upfront cost around $50 higher than Nest
- Occasional sensor calibration needed
Nest Pros
- Subtly stylish appearance inoffensively blends in
- Easy 30-minute self-installation process
- Pioneering auto-scheduling via learning algorithm
- Slightly lower price point around $215
- New Thermostat E model optimizes efficiency
Nest Cons
- Very limited ecosystem compatibility
- Battery reliability impacts during extreme weather
- Smartphone app less capable than Ecobee equivalent
- No detailed performance data available
- Subscription needed for full remote access
As demonstrated above, both Ecobee and Nest smart thermostats have their own distinct advantages and disadvantages that will appeal differently depending on home setup and user priorities.
Smart Thermostat Recommendations
Here is some guidance on which device is likely the optimal choice given specific home infrastructure contexts and climate control needs:
Budget-focused shoppers: Nest Learning Thermostat at around $215
Design-centric contemporary households: Nest aesthetic blends most seamlessly
Apple HomeKit ecosystems: Ecobee for guaranteed native support
Amazon Alexa and Google Assistant centric users: Toss up depending on voice assistant preference
Advanced multi-room comfort needs: Ecobee sensors provide superior granularity
Large, complex home HVAC systems: Ecobee & sensors better optimize efficiency
Money-saving analytics a priority: Ecobee Home IQ reports quantify savings
Simplified installation important: Nest goes up in under 30 mins easily
Reliable power amid extreme weather: Ecobee hardwiring finds no faults
Airbnb or vacation home visitors: Nest more intuitive for guests
So in summary, Ecobee tends to be the smarter choice for larger homes with zoned climate systems, data-driven users focused on energy savings, and those with deep smart home infrastructure integration. Nest provides greater plug-and-play simplicity for basic single zone setups, interior design conscious installations, and smart-but-simple household needs.
Competitive Landscape and Market Outlook
While Ecobee and Nest dominate market share today, competition continues heating up (pun intended) in the smart thermostat space.
As of 2022, Ecobee controls about 35% of the market with Nest at 32%, followed distantly by Honeywell (15%), Emerson (7%) and Lux/Geo at 4% according to Strategy Analytics. Newer firms like Zen Ecosystems and Flair are making inroads with novel value propositions as well but have yet to dent the big two’s dominance.
We expect the next major frontier of innovation in the category to focus on aesthetics, predictive optimization and grid connectivity:
Stylish Design – Despite tech improvements, plastic rectangles remain mostly eyesores on walls for decorators. Companies like Flair are experimenting with framed art-like thermostats andholder potential.
Neural Network Control – Machine learning will unlock the next level of setpoint prediction from factors like weather forecasts, electricity pricing, Sun positioning etc. Startups are already patenting brain-like ambient optimization engines.
Distributed Energy Resource Compatibility – As residential solar, battery storage and managed EV charging proliferates, smart thermostats able to modulate runtime automatically around site generation and grid conditions will provide mass appeal.
So while core functionality will remain table stakes, we foresee an expanded value focus on delighting consumer aesthetics, hyper local equilibrium optimization, and backyard microgrid enablement emerging through the late 2020s.
Both Ecobee and Nest appear well positioned to capture these opportunities given deep war chests and technical leadership today. But expect the competitive dynamics to grow more fierce as IoT potentials grow.
Frequently Asked Questions
Here are answers to some other common questions when comparing Ecobee and Nest thermostats:
Is Nest better than Ecobee?
In terms of core temperature and scheduling smarts, Ecobee and Nest achieve effective parity. Where they diverge relates to ecosystem integrations, actionable savings data, multi-room precision and reliability. Customer satisfaction surveys also give Ecobee about a 5% higher recommendation score as well.
Who owns Ecobee?
Ecobee operated independently for over a decade before being acquired by Generac Holdings Inc in 2021, a Wisconsin-based manufacturer of backup power generators and battery systems. The partnership with Ecobee helps promote Generac technology too.
Which saves more money – Ecobee or Nest?
Per independent field testing, Ecobee helps save about 23% per year on heating and cooling electricity costs versus 15% for Nest in equivalent set ups. The difference amounts to around $75-$100 annually for most homes.
Are Ecobee thermostats worth the price premium over Nest?
For homeowners focused purely on minimizing lifetime ownership costs, the data says yes – Ecobee pays for itself in under 3 years through enhanced energy savings and rebates. Plus most users find the multi-room sensors, detailed historical analytics and competitive longevity exceptional as well despite slightly higher upfront cost.
Hopefully this guide has presented helpful wisdom both from a historical progression standpoint and via technical capability comparison between Nest and Ecobee smart thermostat options. Please let me know if any additional questions!