When building a network attached storage (NAS) device, choosing the right hard drives is critical for performance, reliability, and long-term value. While you can technically use any hard drive in a NAS enclosure, purpose-built NAS drives like Seagate IronWolf and Western Digital WD Red are engineered for the unique demands of 24/7 operation and multi-drive RAID arrays.
In this in-depth guide, we‘ll compare Seagate IronWolf vs WD Red to help you decide which is the best NAS hard drive for your needs. We‘ll dive into the key differences between these two leading options, explore performance benchmarks, and provide recommendations for various use cases. Let‘s get started!
Seagate IronWolf Overview
Seagate‘s IronWolf line is designed specifically for NAS deployment in home, SOHO, and small business environments. There are two distinct tiers to choose from:
-
IronWolf: The entry-level tier, best for home and small office NAS up to 8 bays. Comes in capacities from 1TB to 18TB.
-
IronWolf Pro: Upgraded model with higher performance and reliability for NAS appliances up to 24 bays. Available in 2TB to 20TB.
Here‘s a quick breakdown of the key specs for each IronWolf tier:
| Spec | IronWolf | IronWolf Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 1-18TB | 2-20TB |
| Cache Size | 64MB-256MB | 128MB-256MB |
| Spindle Speed | 5400-7200 RPM | 7200 RPM |
| Max Sustained Transfer Rate | 210 MB/s | 250 MB/s |
| Workload Rating | 180TB/yr | 300TB/yr |
| MTBF | 1 million hours | 1.2 million hours |
| Warranty | 3 years | 5 years |
| Rotational Vibration (RV) Sensors | Included on 4TB+ | Included on 4TB+ |
As you can see, IronWolf Pro delivers meaningfully faster performance, higher durability, and an extra 2 years of warranty coverage compared to standard IronWolf drives. Let‘s take a closer look at a few of the standout features:
AgileArray and Rotational Vibration Sensors
All IronWolf drives feature Seagate‘s AgileArray technology, which optimizes the drive for multi-user NAS environments through RAID error recovery controls, dual-plane balancing, and advanced power management. Rotational vibration (RV) sensors on the 4TB and larger models also help mitigate vibration in multi-drive NAS enclosures.
Helium-Filled Design
Starting at 8TB, IronWolf Pro drives use a sealed, helium-filled design instead of air. Helium has 1/7th the density of air, enabling thinner platters, more platters per drive, and less flutter for the drive heads. This improves capacity, power efficiency, and performance. According to Seagate, IronWolf Pro‘s helium design reduces sensitivity to external environmental factors like humidity and temperature variation.
IronWolf Health Management
Seagate‘s IronWolf Health Management (IHM) system is also included with most IronWolf drives. IHM leverages internal sensors to monitor key parameters like temperature, shock, and vibration. It then provides actionable prevention, intervention, and recovery recommendations through a dashboard in compatible NAS operating systems like Synology DSM and QNAP QTS.
WD Red Overview
The WD Red family is Western Digital‘s answer for reliable, NAS-optimized storage. But unlike Seagate, WD splits the Red lineup into three distinct model lines:
-
WD Red: The standard tier for home and small office NAS up to 8 bays. Available in 1TB to 14TB capacities with 16MB to 64MB cache.
-
WD Red Plus: Slightly upgraded model best for NAS up to 24 bays. Comes in 1TB to 14TB with larger 128MB to 256MB cache options.
-
WD Red Pro: The highest performing tier for business NAS up to 24 bays. Offered in 2TB to 20TB capacities with a consistent 7200 RPM spindle speed and 256MB cache.
Here‘s a quick comparison table of the WD Red tiers:
| Spec | WD Red | WD Red Plus | WD Red Pro |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 1-14TB | 1-14TB | 2-20TB |
| Cache Size | 16-64MB | 128-256MB | 256MB |
| Spindle Speed | 5400 RPM | 5400 RPM | 7200 RPM |
| Max Sustained Transfer Rate | 180 MB/s | 180 MB/s | 235 MB/s |
| Workload Rating | 180TB/yr | 180TB/yr | 300TB/yr |
| MTBF | 1 million hours | 1 million hours | 1 million hours |
| Warranty | 3 years | 3 years | 5 years |
| RV Sensors | Not included | Not included | Included |
Interestingly, WD Red and Red Plus are very similar on core specs. The main differences are Red Plus has larger cache options and official support for larger 24-bay NAS systems.
WD Red Pro is more directly comparable to IronWolf Pro, with a 7200 RPM speed, 300TB/year workload rating, and 5-year warranty. However, unlike IronWolf Pro, WD Red Pro still uses a traditional air-based design.
NASware 3.0 Firmware
All three WD Red tiers feature NASware 3.0, Western Digital‘s custom firmware optimized for NAS environments. This includes NAS-specific error recovery, power management, and vibration protection. TLER (time-limited error recovery) helps prevent drives from being dropped from a RAID array during lengthy error recovery processes.
3D Active Balance Plus
WD Red Pro drives also include Western Digital‘s 3D Active Balance Plus technology. This refers to enhanced dual-plane balance control, which helps ensure the drive platters spin smoothly with less vibration. Embedded RV sensors also detect and compensate for rotational vibration from other drives in multi-bay enclosures.
Performance Benchmarks
Now that we‘ve covered the key specs and features of Seagate IronWolf and WD Red, let‘s see how they stack up in performance testing. We‘ll focus on the flagship pro models, as those are most comparable.
In a StorageReview benchmark of RAID 5 arrays with Synology NAS, the 16TB IronWolf Pro consistently outperformed the 18TB WD Red Pro:
| Benchmark | IronWolf Pro 16TB | WD Red Pro 18TB |
|---|---|---|
| 4K Random Read | 12,113 IOPS | 11,270 IOPS |
| 4K Random Write | 4,178 IOPS | 862 IOPS |
| 64K Sequential Read | 2.28 GB/s | 1.88 GB/s |
| 64K Sequential Write | 1.22 GB/s | 1.18 GB/s |
IronWolf Pro delivered 27% faster sequential read throughput and nearly 5X better 4K random write performance compared to WD Red Pro. Interestingly, despite its lower 16TB capacity, the IronWolf Pro also had the edge on sequential writes.
ServeTheHome saw similar results in their 14TB IronWolf Pro vs. WD Red Pro comparison using a Synology DS1819+ NAS:
"The IronWolf Pro had higher performance across the board in our single client testing. Its 4K random write and 64K sequential write scores, arguably the two most important for a NAS drive, were 60% and 21% higher than the Red Pro respectively."
Based on these benchmarks, IronWolf Pro seems to have a clear performance advantage over WD Red Pro, especially for random writes and in multi-user scenarios. The helium-filled design likely contributes to its strong numbers.
Reliability and Durability
Performance is important, but reliability is paramount for NAS hard drives. The last thing you want is a drive failure causing downtime or data loss in your storage array.
In Backblaze‘s Q1 2022 review of 230,921 HDDs, Seagate drives had an annualized failure rate (AFR) of just 0.66% while Western Digital was slightly higher at 0.71%.
However, AFR can vary substantially by specific model and capacity. For instance, Backblaze saw 0% AFR for 4TB Seagate drives, but 1.01% AFR for 12TB Seagate drives. So take brand-level AFR comparisons with a grain of salt.
Digging into the specs, both IronWolf Pro and WD Red Pro carry workload ratings of 300TB per year and MTBF (mean time between failures) of 1 million hours. But IronWolf Pro has a slight edge on a few durability metrics:
- Longer Warranty: 5 years for IronWolf Pro vs. 3 years for WD Red Pro
- Higher MTBF: 1.2 million hours for IronWolf Pro vs. 1 million hours for WD Red Pro
- Rescue Service: Seagate includes 2 years of data recovery for IronWolf Pro drives, while Western Digital charges extra for a Red Pro recovery plan.
Independent data recovery services like DriveSavers have also noted Seagate having an edge in recovery success rates compared to Western Digital HDDs in recent years.
Choosing the Right Capacity
When choosing between IronWolf and WD Red drives, it‘s important to get the right capacity for your storage needs. Here are a few guidelines:
-
Home media server (1-5 users): 4TB to 8TB per drive should be plenty for most home photo, video, and music collections. Aim for total usable storage of 2-3X your current data footprint to allow for future growth.
-
Home office backup (3-10 users): 4TB to 12TB per drive is a good range for backing up documents and small server databases. Consider 4-5X your current data usage to account for multiple backup versions.
-
Creative pro (1-3 users): Video editing and creative work demand larger capacities. 8TB to 18TB NAS drives will provide ample space for multi-stream 4K/8K video and graphics projects. Build out enough usable capacity for 2-3X your current working set.
-
Small business (5-25 users): 8TB to 16TB drives are best for business file sharing, backup, and virtualization storage. Aim for 3-4X your existing data with room for snapshots and future growth.
Once you‘ve determined your baseline capacity needs, it‘s wise to build in extra headroom for data redundancy (e.g. RAID 1, 5, 6, etc.). For larger arrays, you may also want a couple hot spares on hand for quick rebuilds after a drive failure.
Buying Recommendations
We‘ve covered a lot of ground in comparing Seagate IronWolf vs WD Red drives, but which should you ultimately buy for your NAS? Here are some recommendations for common scenarios:
-
Home media server: The 8TB IronWolf ($260) offers the best mix of performance, reliability, and value. Compared to the 8TB WD Red Plus ($245), it‘s well worth the small premium.
-
Home office backup: Though pricier than the base 4TB WD Red ($85), the 4TB IronWolf ($130) is faster and more reliable. It‘s a better long-term investment for protecting critical data.
-
Creative pro: The 18TB IronWolf Pro ($480) provides ample capacity and top-tier performance for demanding 4K/8K video workflows. The 18TB WD Red Pro ($430) is a close competitor, but falls short on performance benchmarks.
-
Small business: The 12TB IronWolf Pro ($400) is my pick for high-uptime business NAS deployments. It offers an ideal blend of speed, capacity, and reliability in multi-user environments.
-
Flexible and budget-friendly: If you value flexibility and can live with slower speeds, the 8TB WD Red ($210) is a balanced choice for home and small office NAS. It‘s a safe bet for uses like file sharing, backup, and remote access.
Conclusion
In the battle of Seagate IronWolf vs WD Red, IronWolf pulls ahead on performance, durability, and feature set. Its helium-based design delivers measurable benefits in speed and efficiency, while bundled data recovery provides extra peace of mind.
That said, WD Red remains a reliable, proven choice that‘s priced very competitively. For casual home users who don‘t demand peak performance, WD Red is still a strong option.
Ultimately, both IronWolf and Red will serve you well as NAS drives. To decide which is best for you, weigh the performance and durability differences against your budget and intended uses. Refer back to the buying recommendations above for common scenarios.
No matter which drive you choose, remember to keep spare drives on hand and test your backups regularly. Investing in quality NAS storage is a great start, but even the best drives can fail without warning. Stay prepared and your data will thank you!
