Skip to content

Royal Cousins, Rival Queens: The Complex Relationship of Elizabeth I and Mary, Queen of Scots

The 16th century was a time of great upheaval in Europe, marked by religious conflicts, political intrigue, and the rise of powerful female monarchs. Two of the most prominent figures of this era were Elizabeth I, Queen of England, and her cousin Mary, Queen of Scots. Born into royalty and shaped by the tumultuous events of their time, these two women navigated the challenges of ruling in a male-dominated world, leaving an indelible mark on history.

The Tudor-Stuart Connection

To grasp the complex relationship between Elizabeth and Mary, it is essential to understand their family history. The Tudor dynasty, founded by Henry VII, had ruled England since 1485. Henry‘s eldest daughter, Margaret Tudor, married James IV of Scotland, establishing a connection between the English and Scottish royal families. Margaret‘s granddaughter, Mary Stuart, was born in 1542, just six days before her father, James V of Scotland, died, making her Queen of Scotland as an infant.

Elizabeth, born in 1533, was the daughter of Henry VIII and his second wife, Anne Boleyn. Henry‘s desperate quest for a male heir led him to break with the Catholic Church and establish the Church of England when the Pope refused to annul his marriage to Catherine of Aragon. Anne Boleyn‘s failure to produce a male heir and allegations of adultery and treason led to her execution in 1536, leaving Elizabeth in a precarious position.

The Religious Divide

Religion played a crucial role in the lives and reigns of both Elizabeth and Mary. The 16th century was marked by the Protestant Reformation, which challenged the authority of the Catholic Church and led to the establishment of new Protestant denominations. In England, Henry VIII‘s break with Rome and the subsequent religious reforms under his son, Edward VI, had created a deeply divided nation.

Mary, raised in the Catholic faith, faced a difficult task when she returned to Scotland in 1561 after the death of her husband, Francis II of France. Scotland had undergone its own Protestant Reformation, led by John Knox, and Mary‘s Catholicism was viewed with suspicion by many of her subjects. As Queen of Scotland, Mary sought to navigate the religious tensions in her realm while maintaining her own faith.

Elizabeth, on the other hand, adopted a more pragmatic approach to religion. Raised as a Protestant, she recognized the need for religious stability in England and sought to find a middle ground between the Catholic and Protestant factions. The Elizabethan Religious Settlement, established in 1559, created the Church of England as a Protestant church with Elizabeth as its Supreme Governor, while allowing for some Catholic practices to continue.

Plots and Intrigue

As a Catholic queen with a strong claim to the English throne, Mary was viewed as a threat by Elizabeth and her advisors. In 1568, Mary was forced to abdicate the Scottish throne and flee to England, seeking Elizabeth‘s protection. Instead, Elizabeth placed her under house arrest, fearing that Mary would become a focal point for Catholic rebellion.

Over the next two decades, Mary became entangled in a series of plots against Elizabeth. The Ridolfi Plot of 1571 aimed to assassinate Elizabeth, marry Mary to the Duke of Norfolk, and place her on the English throne with Spanish support. The Throckmorton Plot of 1583 sought to coordinate an invasion of England by Spanish and French Catholic forces, with Mary as the figurehead.

The most significant threat came in 1586 with the Babington Plot, masterminded by Anthony Babington and involving direct communication with Mary. The plot aimed to assassinate Elizabeth and install Mary as Queen of England. However, Elizabeth‘s spymaster, Sir Francis Walsingham, had infiltrated the conspiracy, and the plotters were arrested and executed.

Mary‘s involvement in the Babington Plot sealed her fate. She was put on trial for treason in October 1586 and found guilty. Elizabeth, after much hesitation and anguish, signed the death warrant on February 1, 1587. Mary was executed at Fotheringhay Castle on February 8, 1587.

The Correspondence of Queens

Throughout their tumultuous relationship, Elizabeth and Mary communicated through letters, many of which have survived. These letters offer a glimpse into their personal thoughts and feelings, as well as the political maneuverings of the time.

In a letter dated February 1, 1587, just days before Mary‘s execution, Elizabeth wrote:

"You have in various ways and manners attempted to take my life and to bring my kingdom to destruction by bloodshed. I have never proceeded so harshly against you, but have, on the contrary, protected and maintained you like myself. These treasons will be proved to you and all made manifest. Yet it is my will, that you answer the nobles and peers of the kingdom as if I were myself present. I therefore require, charge, and command that you make answer for I have been well informed of your arrogance."

This letter reveals the depth of Elizabeth‘s anger and frustration with Mary, whom she saw as a constant threat to her life and her rule.

Mary, in turn, wrote to Elizabeth in November 1586, protesting her innocence and appealing for mercy:

"I would remind you that there is an eternal record of all our actions and that one day we shall have to render an account of them before an incorruptible Judge. If you must proceed against me, do so, for I am ready to receive what Providence holds in store for me, good or ill."

Legacy and Succession

The execution of Mary, Queen of Scots was a turning point in Elizabeth‘s reign. While it removed a significant threat to her rule, it also damaged her reputation in Europe and strained diplomatic relations with Catholic powers such as Spain. The Spanish Armada, launched in 1588 with the aim of invading England and overthrowing Elizabeth, was in part a response to Mary‘s execution.

Despite the challenges she faced, Elizabeth proved to be a formidable and effective ruler. During her 45-year reign, England experienced a period of relative stability and prosperity, marked by the flourishing of the arts, the expansion of trade, and the establishment of the Church of England as a middle way between Catholicism and Puritanism.

Mary‘s legacy, while more tragic, is no less significant. Her life and death have captured the imagination of generations, inspiring countless works of art, literature, and film. Her son, James VI of Scotland, succeeded Elizabeth as James I of England in 1603, uniting the two kingdoms and founding the Stuart dynasty that would rule England, Scotland, and Ireland for more than a century.

Conclusion

The story of Elizabeth I and Mary, Queen of Scots, is one of the most captivating and complex in British history. Their relationship, shaped by the political, religious, and personal factors of their time, continues to fascinate scholars and the public alike.

As two of the most prominent female rulers of the 16th century, Elizabeth and Mary faced unique challenges and opportunities. They navigated the treacherous waters of European politics, sought to balance the demands of their faith with the needs of their subjects, and asserted their authority in a world that was often hostile to female power.

Their legacy endures as a testament to the resilience, intelligence, and determination of women in leadership roles. While their relationship was marked by rivalry and conflict, it also speaks to the complex bonds of family, duty, and shared experience that connected them across the centuries.

In the end, the story of Elizabeth I and Mary, Queen of Scots, is a reminder of the enduring fascination with the lives and times of those who shaped history. As long as there are those who seek to understand the past and its relevance to the present, their story will continue to be told, studied, and celebrated.