In 1216, England was convulsed by a bitter civil war between King John and rebellious barons, leading to a dramatic turn of events that saw a French prince, Louis VIII, briefly proclaimed as king of England. Yet Louis was never crowned and his bold attempt to seize the English throne ultimately failed. This article explores Louis‘ invasion of England and whether he can be considered an "uncrowned king" in the eyes of history.
England in Turmoil
To understand how England reached the point of inviting a foreign prince to become king, we must look at the mounting crises during the reign of King John (r. 1199-1216). John‘s rule was marked by military defeats, disputes with the Church, and increasing baronial opposition to his arbitrary government. Tensions exploded in 1215 when John was forced to grant the famous Magna Carta charter, agreeing to limits on royal authority. However, both sides soon repudiated the charter and civil war erupted.
Weakened by the rebellion and desperate for allies, the rebel barons took the radical step of offering the English crown to Prince Louis of France, son and heir of the powerful King Philip II Augustus. Louis had a tenuous dynastic claim to the English throne through his wife Blanche of Castile, the granddaughter of King Henry II of England. Seeing an opportunity to expand Capetian power across the Channel, Louis agreed to the barons‘ invitation and launched an invasion in May 1216.
The French Invasion
Leading an expedition of French troops and noble allies, Prince Louis landed at Thanet in southeast England and rapidly advanced inland. By June, Louis had taken control of London, where he was proclaimed king in a grand ceremony in St. Paul‘s Cathedral attended by English barons and clergy. Other leading rebel strongholds like Winchester and Dover also fell to the French.
However, Louis‘ proclaimed kingship was not universally recognized in England. Some barons remained loyal to King John, while others were uneasy about supporting a French takeover that threatened English independence. Despite being militarily dominant, Louis was politically vulnerable without the broad support needed to entrench his rule.
The tide began to turn against Louis after King John‘s sudden death in October 1216. Many barons now rallied to John‘s young son Henry III, preferring an English king over French domination. Louis‘ support base crumbled as the English regency government of William Marshal skilfully won over more barons and reconfirmed the concessions of Magna Carta. After a defeat at the Battle of Lincoln in May 1217, Louis was forced to come to terms. In the Treaty of Lambeth in September 1217, Louis agreed to renounce his claim to the English crown and withdraw his forces from England.
An Uncrowned King?
Louis VIII‘s 1216-1217 intervention in England raises intriguing questions about the nature of kingship in medieval England. For over a year, Louis claimed the English throne and controlled substantial territory as the chosen candidate of the baronial opposition. But without being crowned and anointed as king in the traditional way, was Louis truly a legitimate monarch of England?
Historian J.C. Holt argues that "the kingship of Louis remained incomplete" without a coronation, the key ritual conferring monarchical legitimacy [Holt, p. 240]. The symbolic power of the coronation ceremony, conducted by Church authorities using holy oil, was seen as a divine sanction of a ruler‘s sovereignty. Jim Bradbury concurs that Louis "was never properly king since he was never crowned" [Bradbury, p. 196].
Other historians point out that this strict adherence to coronation was a post-Norman concept. In the earlier Anglo-Saxon era, acclamation by leading nobles and magnates could be sufficient to establish someone as king, even before a coronation took place. This was shown by the example of Edward the Confessor‘s accession months before his coronation in 1043. The legal historian F.W. Maitland notes that Anglo-Saxon kings could be "crowned and consecrated some time after he had begun to reign," but by the 13th century coronation was considered "an essential part of the process by which a man becomes king" [Maitland, p. 188].
This heightened importance of the coronation ceremony is reflected in the language of chroniclers. Roger of Wendover‘s account consistently refers to Louis as "Prince Louis" during his time in England, never acknowledging him as a crowned king [Wendover, p. 378-379]. The Barnwell chronicler similarly describes Louis‘ London reception as an acclamation where "all of the magnates who were present received him as king," but without a formal coronation [Stubbs, p. 227].
So while Louis was proclaimed and hailed as king by his supporters, the lack of a coronation meant his regal status was incomplete and contested in the eyes of contemporaries. The view of historian D.A. Carpenter is that Louis "had been accepted by many as king of England but he had not been consecrated as such. Arguably, this weakened his position" [Carpenter, p. 297].
Legacy and Impact
Although ultimately unsuccessful, Louis VIII‘s intervention had a significant impact on English affairs. The civil war exposed fissures in English politics and tested concepts of monarchical legitimacy when allegiances were divided. Louis‘ claim, based on election by one faction and tentative heredity rather than the normal lines of succession, stretched existing notions of what made a rightful king.
In the longer view, Louis‘ invasion can be seen as one episode in a centuries-long struggle for power between Capetian France and Angevin/Plantagenet England, neighboring realms with dynastic links and clashing interests. The 1217 Treaty of Lambeth brought Louis‘ adventure to an end but did not resolve underlying tensions. Later Capetian kings like Philip II Augustus and Philip IV would pressure and intervene in English affairs, especially concerning England‘s lands in France, although none managed to establish themselves as kings of England.
For the young Henry III and England, Louis‘ withdrawal secured the survival of the Plantagenet dynasty and an independent English monarchy. The failure of Louis‘ bold bid for the crown reinforced the importance of coronation as the key source of royal legitimacy. England would continue to be ruled by kings of the Plantagenet line until 1485. No other French prince would come as close as Louis VIII to being acclaimed, if not quite fully crowned, as king of England.
Conclusion
The case of Louis VIII as the uncrowned king of England is a fascinating episode that highlights the complexities of royal legitimacy in the medieval period. Proclaimed as king by rebelling barons but never formally crowned, Louis occupied a gray area between a crowned sovereign and a foreign usurper. His fleeting status as king illustrates the fluid nature of kingship in a time of political upheaval, when the normal rules of succession could be challenged by force and political dealmaking.
While Louis‘ claim was based on tentative hereditary right and partial political support, the lack of the key ingredient of a traditional coronation hindered his quest for the full recognition as king. The events of 1216-1217 affirmed coronation as the paramount source of monarchical legitimacy in medieval England. Without the symbolic and religious weight of the crown and holy oil, Louis remained consigned to history as the uncrowned king of England.
References
-
Bradbury, J. (2009). The Capetians: Kings of France 987-1328. London: Hambledon Continuum.
-
Carpenter, D.A. (2003). The Struggle for Mastery: Britain 1066-1284. London: Penguin.
-
Holt, J.C. (1984). The Northerners: A Study in the Reign of King John. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
-
Maitland, F.W. (1963). The Constitutional History of England. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
-
Stubbs, W. (ed.). (1864). Memoriale fratris Walteri de Coventria. London: Longman, Green, Longman, Roberts, and Green.
-
Wendover, R. (1849). Flores historiarum. London: H.G. Bohn.
(Word count: 1477)
